McKimm & Lott - Lawyers

Spousal Support and Income Tax

Coll — Fri, 07 May 2010 22:04:32 +0000

An issue arises from time to time where one spouse has an obligation to pay spousal support to the other spouse, after a relationship has failed. The issue is income tax. Spousal support payments are one area of family law where tax savings may be possible.

If spousal support is being paid, the payor may be able to deduct the payments made, from their taxable income. At the same time, as always, what is a tax savings to one person is a tax burden to the other. The recipient of the support payments, has to declare, and pay income tax on, those payments.

Care should be taken however. The deduction will only be allowed if the payments are periodic and pursuant to an written agreement or Court Order. For example a ”one-time” lump sum payment, of spousal support, is not going to be tax deductible to the payor.

As well, any agreement to pay periodic spousal support, needs to be in writing, an oral agreement to pay will not be sufficient. If periodic payments have been made (usually monthly), prior to a written agreement, it may still be possible to have those earlier payments, made tax deductible in the agreement, if the correct wording is used.

Deductibility of spousal support payments offers a rare example of a possible win/win for parties from a income tax point of view. If a payor earns more than the recipient the amount of tax saved by the payor may be more than the amount of additional tax paid by the recipient on the spousal support payments. Depending on each person’s income, the payor could also agree to protect the recipient from any additional income tax incurred. In those circumstances, each side would either end up either paying less tax or in the case of the recipient, having more money to spend, with no increased taxes to pay.

Spousal Support and Income Tax is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

Should We Have an Agreement?

Coll — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:33:16 +0000

It is not unusual for couples to consider entering into a written agreement, prior to commencing co-habitation or marriage. This is particularly true where one or both of the parties have been involved in an earlier relationship or where there are significant assets.

There is no question that while negotiating such agreements may not be terribly romantic, they can certainly prevent disputes, if the relationship subsequently breaks down. When considering such agreements what needs to be discussed in particular is what happens should the relationship survive for several years. An agreement that may be fair at the start of a relationship, may become very unfair after a couple has been together for many years.

One way to address such a concern, is to build in a gradual equalization of any asset division, as the years go by. For example, a spouse who enters a relationship with very little might receive an increasing share of the various assets, every few years.

If you and your partner are considering any sort of formal agreement, we can help. Contact us at the office most convenient for you.

Should We Have an Agreement? is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

The Adult Child

Coll — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:27:59 +0000

From time to time clients will need child support for a child who is 19 years of age or older. Usually the amount of child support to be paid is fairly straight forward. You simply consult the Child Support Guidelines. The amount shown in the Guidelines will tell you the base amount of child support. For an adult child however the appropriate amount of child support can be more difficult to determine.

Depending on the circumstances, the ability of an adult child to support themselves may mean that the Guidelines do not apply. For example, if a child qualifies for student loans, or earns income during the summer months, there may be a reduction in the amount otherwise payable under the Guidelines.

Simply because a child is 19 years of age, or older, does not mean they have no entitlement to child support. The amount of child support for an adult child however, usually needs to be examined in greater detail than support for children under 19.

The Adult Child is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

But We Have Joint Custody

Coll — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:34:28 +0000

When couples separate they often struggle with the issue of custody. Often each party will want to continue to parent their children, despite the separation. The concept of parenting however really covers two different issues. Parenting can mean who makes decisions, such as educational, health and well-being decisions, for the children. Also parenting can mean where the children reside. A joint custody arrangement deals with the first issue, not the second.

With a joint custody arrangement, parenting decisions are to be made jointly after discussion as to what is in the children’s best interest. Where the children actually reside remains a separate issue to be settled between the couple, despite any agreement for joint custody. The children may reside, for example, most of the time, with one parent, even though there is a joint custody arrangement in place. It is the residence arrangement that is used to determine who pays child support. Consequently when working out any custody arrangement it is important to discuss not just custody but also where the children are going to reside and for what length of time.

But We Have Joint Custody is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

I Don’t Need a Lawyer.

Coll — Fri, 16 May 2008 23:45:58 +0000

One of the problems the legal system is wrestling with these days are parties who represent themselves in Court. This is particularly common in family law situations. One or both parties may not be able to afford a lawyer. They may have no choice but to act on their own behalf.

Often family law trials are difficult emotional experiences for parties, even when represented by lawyers. Acting on their own behalf forces people to also deal with unfamiliar rules in surroundings that can be intimidating at the best of times.

Judges and court staff do the best they can to help people who represent themselves. Also constant efforts are being made to simplify legal rules, to make the judicial system easier to work with, for people who are not legally trained.

More recognition is being given as well to “unbundling” legal services. This means hiring a lawyer to assist in only certain aspects of a family law matter. For example, asking a lawyer for their input at only certain stages of the proceedings, rather than having that lawyer involved from start to finish.

The advantage of “unbundling” is that it can keep the costs down, yet also provide guidance to a party trying to represent themselves.

I Don’t Need a Lawyer. is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

Who Gets the Pay Raise?

Coll — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:15:42 +0000

An issue that has troubled the law for many years is retroactive child support. The problem arises when a parent paying child support gets an increase in their pay. You would think if income goes up, child support would automatically go up as well. For many years however trying to get child support increased retroactively was not easy.

For example, if a pay raise was kept secret by the paying parent, the application to increase child support might occur years after the increase actually happened. Not surprisingly Courts were concerned about awarding a large lump sum for retroactive support, years after the fact, particularly if the child was an adult by the time the application was made.

The winds of change are starting to blow however. Our Courts are beginning to place a greater emphasis on the paying parent having to disclose increases in income, when such increases occur. It is certainly not an absolute requirement, yet, but the trend seems clear. If you are required to pay child support, and you receive an increase in your income, it makes sense to disclose that increase and adjust the amount you are paying under the Child Support Guidelines. A failure to do so, could risk a large lump sum award, years later.

Who Gets the Pay Raise? is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

The Angry Spouse

Coll — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:08:06 +0000

Unfortunately family law can and often does involve emotions. One of those emotions can be anger. At times one, or both, of the parties involved in family law proceedings may be highly emotional. They may be very angry.

It is important to recognize this fact. The lawyer and their client need to deal with it. Many lawyers can and will recommend counseling, or other assistance for their client. Sometimes however the angry party may not be that lawyer’s client.

In such a case, because of the anger, settlement, through mediation, or otherwise, may be very difficult or impossible. Such a situation needs to be recognized and discussed. Not every party to a family law proceeding is reasonable.

You may be involved in such a situation, and yet want to move on with your life. Talk with your lawyer about what has developed but in such circumstances the best option may simply be to proceed to Court. No matter how many fair settlement proposals are made, if one person is angry and unreasonable, it may be impossible to settle.

Going to Court, in such circumstances, is not a failure to communicate. Instead, it is a recognition that a reasonable, fair settlement, cannot be obtained through negotiation. The time may have come to move forward in the only way possible, through a Court Order.

The Angry Spouse is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

To Sue or Not to Sue

Coll — Thu, 31 May 2007 18:55:19 +0000

Often a family law client will ask if they should go to court. Sometimes you should and sometimes you should not. In some cases going to court is the worst possible step to take. In others it is the only step to take.

The real key to making this type of decision is whether each party is being reasonable as matters proceed. For example, is information about assets and income being disclosed promptly and completely? Are arrangements for such things as access to the children being accomplished with a minimum of fuss? Is financial help being provided in a reasonable amount, without the need for constant requests? Does there seem to be a will, by both spouses, to try and reach a settlement? All of these practical issues will help to determine whether there is a need for court proceedings.

Sometimes only one court application is needed to determine, for example, interim support. Sometimes every step has to be litigated. Sometimes there is no need to go to court at all. There is no one answer that fits every situation. The most important factor however, is usually whether there is a reasonable level of cooperation between parties. If so, court proceedings, and the accompanying costs, can often be avoided.

If you have questions call or email our office – (250) 656-3961 – reception@mclott.com

To Sue or Not to Sue is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

Why Everything Takes So Long

Coll — Tue, 22 May 2007 17:00:12 +0000

One of the greatest frustrations for clients in family law situations can be the length of time things seem to take. What may seem like a simple procedure to a client, for example, the drafting of a separation agreement, can stretch on for months. On occasion, family law litigation can take several years to complete.

Often a client has no control over many of the causes of the delay. Busy courts, overworked lawyers, and delay by the “other side” can all have a negative impact on getting the job done. Nevertheless there are some things a client can do to avoid unnecessary delay.

If a request is made, typically for financial information, it is important to get the requested information promptly. Be organized as well. It will only delay matters if a client gives their lawyer a mass of disorganized invoices, pay slips and income tax returns. Certainly the lawyer or their staff will eventually get everything organized but much time delay (and expense) can be avoided if a client takes responsibility for putting together the financial information in the form requested.

Finally, don’t be afraid to ask for time estimates from your lawyer. If things are not being done within the time estimated, then find out why. Often delay can be reduced or eliminated if there is regular communication between the lawyer and their client so that both know what needs to be done and when.

If you have questions call or email our office – (250) 656-3961 – reception@mclott.com

Why Everything Takes So Long is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

I Want a Legal Separation

How Long Do We Have to Live Together?

Coll — Tue, 15 May 2007 23:03:52 +0000

There can be confusion over how long a couple needs to live together before “rights” arise. Couples sometimes assume if they do not marry and live together for less than two years, there can be no legal claims. Although there is a two year requirement under the Family Relations Act, before a claim for spousal maintenance can be made, that is not the end of the matter.

For example, if a couple starts living together, each may bring assets into the relationship. One spouse however, may own much more than the other. One spouse might own a house. The couple might start living together in that house. At the same time, the non-owning spouse might, for several months, do a lot of work on that house.

Should the relationship fail, even though lasting only a few months, the non-owning spouse has a potential trust claim, for an interest in that house. There is a solution to this problem, known as a cohabitation agreement, the subject of another post.

If you have questions call or email our office – (250) 656-3961 – reception@mclott.com

How Long Do We Have to Live Together? is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

I Want a Legal Separation

I Want a Legal Separation

Coll — Mon, 07 May 2007 17:03:17 +0000

One question a client often asks is “How do I get legally separated?” The short response a lawyer might give is “Lets talk about the important issues first”. Separation when a relationship breaks down, is a question of intention. A couple can be separated and still living under the same roof. At the same time, spouses can be living in different countries, and not consider themselves separated. If one or both spouse considers the relationship to have broken down, then a separation has occurred regardless of who is living where. In most situations, by the time a client is seeing a lawyer about a family law issue, a legal separation has already occurred. Usually therefore, there is really nothing further to be done to “get separated”.

What the lawyer means should they give that rather rude response, is something quite different. What the lawyer means is that while a separation has occurred not a lot turns on the separation itself, from a legal point of view (from an emotional point of view of course, quite a lot may turn on a separation).

The real issues that the lawyer and client need to talk about are such things as custody, support and asset division. The length of time a couple is separated can be important for calculating grounds for divorce, or entitlement to apply for support, in some cases, but those issues are usually minor in comparison to others the lawyer may want to discuss.

If you have questions call or email our office – (250) 656-3961 – reception@mclott.com

I Want a Legal Separation is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

What Will it Cost?

Coll — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:55:49 +0000

For many people, the first time they meet a lawyer is when they are seeking help for a family law problem. Emotions can be running high and many of the initial discussions can center around unfamiliar or intensely personal issues. Sometimes, sensible discussions about costs and family finances, are lost in the turmoil.

When you meet with a lawyer, with questions about family law, you should make an effort to discuss what costs you can expect. If a relationship has broken down, particularly a long term one, there may be very significant financial issues to be decided. The amount of potential costs incurred may be small, compared to a result that provides you with financial security.

On the other hand, time can easily be wasted, and legal expenses incurred, over issues that have little to do with bringing matters to a conclusion. It is not easy, but discussing overall costs, planning a budget with those costs in mind, and deciding whether the benefits outweigh the costs, are matters that should be addressed as early as possible in your discussions with your lawyer.

Your relationship with your lawyer, even in the most emotional of family law cases, is always, to a degree, a business one. It is helpful to discuss and settle the terms of that business relationship, at the start.

If you have questions call or email our office – (250) 656-3961 – reception@mclott.com

What Will it Cost? is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

Monthly Finances

Coll — Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:24:04 +0000

Often when a lawyer and a client meet to discuss a family law matter, not enough time is spent on the crucial issue of monthly finances. When a relationship breaks down the emotional issues can be enormous. At the same time that the client is struggling to deal with those issues the lawyer may be struggling to understand how much money their client needs every month, to live on.

It is not unusual for only one party in a relationship to deal with all the day to day financial issues. Consequently, when that relationship breaks down, the other party can be lost when it comes to knowing what their monthly financial needs are. This can lead to unreasonable expectations of spousal and child support, either far too high or far too low.

When talking with your lawyer on a family law matter, ask about budgeting. Try and have a good grasp of what your monthly financial needs are. Copies of account statements, income tax returns, bank statements, credit card statements and pay stubs, are all helpful. You will probably be asked to complete a financial statement. Try and be realistic when doing so. Try and return that financial statement promptly to your lawyer so he or she can properly advise you on what you can reasonably expect to receive every month, for support.

Clearly understanding your monthly financial situation, as promptly as possible after separation, can avoid unpleasant surprises at a later date.

If you have questions call or email our office – (250) 656-3961 – reception@mclott.com

Monthly Finances is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

The First Visit to Your Lawyer

Coll — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:44:24 +0000

The first time you visit a lawyer with a family law problem don’t be surprised if they ask you about issues that to you, do not seem important. Much time is often spent, in that first interview, with each person talking about matters that, to the other, are not relevant.

For example, you may want to discuss your spouse’s conduct and behavior towards you. Such an issue, while extraordinarily important to you, often has little relevance to what the lawyer is trained to talk about, which are the legal issues. At the same time, the lawyer may ask you about your spouse’s pension, which can be a important legal issue but to you, at that point in time, is not of concern.

Before that first visit, try and consider why you are seeing the lawyer. Are you going to discuss how a relationship broke down or are you going to discuss the legal impact of such a break down. The distinction is important. On the one hand most lawyers are not trained as counselors and are not really going to be able to help with relationship issues. On the other hand lawyers are very well trained in the legal principles that apply when a family law problem arises.

Appreciating the distinction between the two can only help you with your first visit to your lawyer.

If you have questions call or email our office – (250) 656-3961 – reception@mclott.com

The First Visit to Your Lawyer is a post from: McKimm & Lott Lawyers

Share this Page:

Nola M. Silzer